From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 8 14:45:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82AE216A4CE for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:45:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8CB43D45 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:45:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 25390 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2005 14:45:09 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Feb 2005 14:45:09 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 25B2E81; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 09:45:08 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Olivier Nicole References: <20050208085748.GA13424@sdf.lonestar.org> <200502080907.j1897gdL071181@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 08 Feb 2005 09:45:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200502080907.j1897gdL071181@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Message-ID: <44acqfcdqk.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 22 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: tiberius@trancell.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dumb question about ports/packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 14:45:09 -0000 Olivier Nicole writes: > > How would I upgrade just one package part of the core like that? Or multiple > > ones for that matter. Can you use the ports/packages system? Or do you have > > to do an entire system upgrade (i.e. 4.10 to 4.11). > > I'd say, given that ssh is part of the ports > (/usr/ports/security/ssh), you could ust upgrade that port and install > that port. > > I'd cvsup ports/security > > then make && make install for ssh Um, no, as the original poster pointed out, ssh is part of the base system, and normally you don't need the port. Upgrading the base system *is* the best approach. It *doesn't* normally require updating to the latest release; 4.10, for example, is still a supported branch, and will be for (at least) another year or so. Updating to the latest of the 4.10 branch will do fine for this kind of problem.