From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 12 13:53:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103A816A400 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 13:53:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D72143D6E for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 13:53:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 37so1170535wra for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 05:53:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=n5mKitC3mPe2+W5xN5hEjhHHIp8W1K153gfyXQqyJFzfX/HkW+TIrgZey3kxTCTJR49Ws6n7Mxv9ox+/mEBbIirEaLTeaz1uie1gMMSeHerROF3Bvg/PVmqn18OXdqjf0pIos/12ntDM+/o1/dGEdEbzbZaqOZJxJX6WN2gLFpI= Received: by 10.54.151.7 with SMTP id y7mr2093717wrd; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 05:53:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.105.5 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 05:53:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 16:53:07 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" To: "Wojciech Puchar" In-Reply-To: <20060312105141.K18712@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <001901c64517$9d891950$6701a8c0@GRANT> <44138FC9.30900@daleco.biz> <20060312105141.K18712@chylonia.3miasto.net> Cc: Grant Peel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dd - cloning a disk. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 13:53:13 -0000 On 3/12/06, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > > It is, with a few 'buts'. Firstly, the source should be mounted > > but may not - unless system is generally idle. fsck will be checking the > copy then, but with success. No matter what fsck says later, it's too dangerous. A FreeBSD system (as well as any other complicated OS) is never really idle in terms of disk I/O. On 3/12/06, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > list sometime in the last 3-5 weeks. Giorgios Keramidas > > commented that "dd" was too slow for his tastes and > > dd is the fastest, but probably he used small block size. 64K is OK dd can be slower than dump/restore in quite a few cases, especially when disk is far from full.