From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Apr 23 19:31:39 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA18157
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 23 Apr 1995 19:31:39 -0700
Received: from star-gate.com (hasty.vip.best.com [204.156.141.143])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA18145
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 23 Apr 1995 19:31:35 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by star-gate.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA00688; Sun, 23 Apr 1995 19:24:01 GMT
Message-Id: <199504231924.TAA00688@star-gate.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: star-gate.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6delta 4/7/95
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
Subject: Re: benchmark hell.. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 23 Apr 1995 18:23:19 MST."
             <16028.798686599@freefall.cdrom.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 1995 19:23:57 +0000
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@star-gate.com>
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>>> "Jordan K. Hubbard" said:
 > > > Part of the execl problem is the Sun-OS style shared libs that we
 > > > use.
 > > 
 > > To the contrary, *make*ing the Linux shlib's is a pain in the butt,
 > > while it's a very easy process to create a SunOS-like shlib.
 > 

Excuse,  but how many copies of static shared libraries must one keep 
in a linux  system :)

Yeah , their implementation is faster than ours in this case I rather keep
our implementation of shared libraries.

	Amancio