From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul  5 17:52:51 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3837437B401; Sat,  5 Jul 2003 17:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 55ACE43FF2; Sat,  5 Jul 2003 17:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h660qldP014911;
	Sat, 5 Jul 2003 18:52:47 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 09:52:42 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20030706.095242.82862294.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: diz@linuxpowered.com
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <3F076BAC.7050304@linuxpowered.com>
References: <16135.14729.867357.839956@canoe.velocet.net>
	<20030705221335.GC66426@sunbay.com>
	<3F076BAC.7050304@linuxpowered.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [current] hostap+wi
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 00:52:51 -0000

In message: <3F076BAC.7050304@linuxpowered.com>
            Jon Disnard <diz@linuxpowered.com> writes:
: I'm not aware of any other chips that allow for this groovy hostap mode 
: unless the formerly unsupported atheros chips do. I figure the idea is 
: not unique, and the feature seems logical for vendors to build their 
: AP's based on common hardware.

The atheros chipsets also support it...

Warner