Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:02:03 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Rob <spamrefuse@yahoo.com>, FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: make -j$n buildworld : use of -j investigated Message-ID: <p0620070dbdc9a526c0f2@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <41A3E6D8.3060502@yahoo.com> References: <41A2A7A2.3040102@yahoo.com> <41A2B3BB.3020108@yahoo.com> <p0620070abdc92b7c3cd2@[128.113.24.47]> <41A3E6D8.3060502@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:41 AM +0900 11/24/04, Rob wrote: >Garance A Drosihn wrote: >> >>Also, did you do your benchmarking before or after the recent >>fixes to -j processing? I haven't redone them after that change, >>and I think it will be interesting to see what effect that has. > >These tests were done on 5.3-Stable as of Nov. 22nd. > >I believe these -j changes were applied to 6-Current. Or am I wrong? You are correct. My mistake, I overlooked what you said about this being on 5.3-stable. I am too focused on 6.x-current due to a few system builds that I've been doing. Still, I do think it will be interesting to see how the recent -j changes will effect the benchmarking. The way it worked before, you often getting "more -j than you asked for", and I think that would have to be significant. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0620070dbdc9a526c0f2>