From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 09:35:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A156F16A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:35:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from burka.carrier.kiev.ua (burka.carrier.kiev.ua [193.193.193.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33FD243D49 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:35:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from netch@lucky.net) Received: from netch@localhost [127.0.0.1] (netch@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by burka.carrier.kiev.ua with ESMTP id i619Z9S3048454 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:35:13 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from netch@burka.carrier.kiev.ua) Received: (from netch@localhost) by burka.carrier.kiev.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i619Z9OT048451 for current@freebsd.org; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:35:09 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from netch) Resent-From: netch@lucky.net Resent-Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:35:09 +0300 Resent-Message-ID: <20040701093509.GA48194@lucky.net> Resent-To: current@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:41:38 +0300 From: Valentin Nechayev To: Jon Noack Message-ID: <20040701084138.GE1085@lucky.net> References: <20040701061818.GA80579@lucky.net> <20040701063105.GA20785@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040701080628.GB80579@lucky.net> <40E3CC38.90904@alumni.rice.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40E3CC38.90904@alumni.rice.edu> X-42: On X-Verify-Sender: verified cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: LOR (vm object - swap_pager swhash) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 09:35:31 -0000 Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 03:32:56, noackjr wrote about "Re: LOR (vm object - swap_pager swhash)": > >>>>lock order reversal > >> > >>*yawn* :-) > > > >As newer -current is said as too broken, it wasn't got. If > >revolutions round is finished, please say date for moderately calm > >period which can be used for cvsupping. > > I think you misunderstand. This lock order reversal is a frequently > reported false positive. It is harmless. For more information (see LOR > id #1): > http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html Thanks. Whether should be added to `-current FAQ' and posted regularly? > Kris responded with a yawn because he's answered this question so many > times.... It wasn't a question.;) -netch-