Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:56:40 +0200
From:      Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>
To:        babkin@freebsd.org
Cc:        cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Are prototypes for main() illegal by any standard ? (was Re: 
Message-ID:  <200112190956.fBJ9ufO79815@grimreaper.grondar.org>
In-Reply-To: <3C1FEEA9.EEE89A7@bellatlantic.net> ; from Sergey Babkin <babkin@bellatlantic.net>  "Tue, 18 Dec 2001 20:34:33 EST."
References:  <3C1FEEA9.EEE89A7@bellatlantic.net> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > And it should compile warning-free and run without error. Agreed
> > that the style sucks, but it is _legal_ - and any compiler's prior
> 
> No, it's completely wrong. The return type of main() is int. 
> Otherwise you get garbage for the exit code.

Like I said, the style sucks, but I may not _care_ abiut the exit code.
I may want the exit code for entropy :-). Etc..

M
-- 
o       Mark Murray
\_      FreeBSD Services Limited
O.\_    Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200112190956.fBJ9ufO79815>