From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 13 05:43:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57BAF16A47E for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 05:43:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Received: from espresso2.syncrontech.com (sync-old.syncrontech.com [213.28.98.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B6943D46 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 05:43:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Received: from guinness.syncrontech.com (guinness.syncrontech.com [62.71.8.57]) by espresso2.syncrontech.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k9D5hWtp048363; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:43:32 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (coffee.syncrontech.com [192.168.5.102]) by guinness.syncrontech.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k9D5hV7Y002160; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:43:32 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Message-ID: <452F277D.4010506@suutari.iki.fi> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:43:25 +0300 From: Ari Suutari User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marko Lerota References: <452E2151.80500@suutari.iki.fi> <86hcy9zc1h.fsf@sparrow.local> <3FE17199-C351-4C29-AC36-7A94F344C135@khera.org> <86mz81xj3q.fsf@sparrow.local> <8664epxi0s.fsf@sparrow.local> In-Reply-To: <8664epxi0s.fsf@sparrow.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Vivek Khera , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: carp0 interface goes down on 6.2-PRERELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 05:43:35 -0000 Hi, Marko Lerota wrote: > I meant: > Maybe first they have to talk to each other and say: > "OK, I will be the master first, and you wait. And if I don't send > you any more sync packets, then you should be in charge :)" I have been using freevrrpd for quite a long time now and I think that carp is basicly the same thing (ie. VRRP) but a kernel implementation. It doesn't require both nodes to be alive when the system starts, if there is only one system and it doesn't hear advertisements from anyone, it goes to MASTER state after a while. Ari S.