From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 23 04:04:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CF637B401 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 04:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from archimedes.rsn.bth.se (archimedes.rsn.bth.se [194.47.145.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D9C43FB1 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 04:04:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from defacto@home.se) Received: from jarl.home.se (as4-3-5.paa.hs.bonet.se [217.215.11.194]) by archimedes.rsn.bth.se (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h3NBaHYd098686 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:36:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from defacto@home.se) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030423122449.0244a058@pop3.hbg.bonet.se> X-Sender: jalle@archimedes.rsn.bth.se X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:04:08 +0200 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Jalle Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Why is FreeBSD so SLOW? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:04:13 -0000 Hello FreeBSD friends! First of all, I just want to say that this mail is not meant to offend anyone, and that it is a technical oriented mail, only with a tint of "computer theology". I don't wish to start another one of those "holy wars"-threads (FreeBSD vs Linux vs Windows kinda), I just wan't to sort some stuff out. I've been using FreeBSD for a few years now and I like the freedom and control it gives me. After running it alongside Win2k (which, frankly, is a great OS) for several years I finally switched to FreeBSD only, no more dual-boot! =o) Now, everyone says that FreeBSD is supposed to be so fast and reliable. Reliable, I fully agree! But fast? No, it's actually much slower on my machine than any Windows distro ever was! Sure, only running in text mode is fast as hell, but no good for everyday use. I've tried several WMs and Desktop Suites, like Enlightenment (e16 and e17), Blackbox, Gnome2, KDE3 etc. They're great n' all, but as soon as I switch to graphical UI everything slows down to a snail's pace! Even a simple terminal is slow. I've played around with Linux a couple of times, and with several flavors (Mandrake, Debian, RedHat, Gentoo), and they where all MUCH faster using a graphical interface than FreeBSD! I have a Pentium III 450 MHz with 320 MB RAM, a SoundBlaster AWE 64 Gold and a Matrox G400 MAX video card. I know, this is not top-of-the-line hardware, but that doesn't mean that it should run three or four (or more) times faster under Linux, right? So, to the point! I like FreeBSD (I prefer using FBSD before Windows or Linux), and I would like to keep using it. But if I can't watch a movie or use a decent file manager I will have to switch to Linux. Oh yeah, BTW, is there really NO WAY of getting simultaneous sounds in FreeBSD?!? I think that's kinda crappy. I mean MS did it, why can't we? Finally the QUESTION: Why is my FreeBSD box so slow? I figure, if FreeBSD in general was so slow, then noone would really use it. Are there any "standard tricks" in the book that speeds up a slow X server or WM, or just FreeBSD in general? Humbly and with Best Regards! /Jalle PS. If you feel an urge to hit down some nasty words in a mail and send it to this babbling MS-loving idiot, please read the very top section in my mail again. Technical answers and explanations only, pleeaase! DS.