From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jan 11 6:30:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (wwweasel.geeksrus.net [64.67.200.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA29537B402; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 06:30:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from there (localhost.geeksrus.net [127.0.0.1]) by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g0BETOe35486; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:29:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from alane@geeksrus.net) Message-Id: <200201111429.g0BETOe35486@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Alan E To: Joe Marcus Clarke Subject: Re: ports/33777: samba WITH_CUPS pulls in cups meta-port, not cups-base Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:29:24 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: <20020111021009.A77067@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <20020111021009.A77067@shumai.marcuscom.com> Cc: FreeBSD ports list , dwcjr@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Friday 11 January 2002 02:10, you wrote: > I think this is a mistake. Samba needs the CUPS printing binaries to > do printing. When you configure Samba for CUPS printing, it > automatically sets the printing variables to point to the CUPS lp > I think you are right. Although, that being the case, WTF is it linking against libcups? Well, I guess my change needs to be backed out pending investigation of how and why this samba + cups printing works. Damn. (Problem is, anything that can pull in cups-lpr gets somebody ticked off 'cause it messes up their printing. Oh well...) -- Alan Eldridge Pmmfmffmmfmp mmmpppppffmpmfpmpppff PmpMpmMpp ppfppp MpfpffmppmppMmpFmmMpm mfpmmmmmfpmpmpppff. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message