From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 15:12:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD4434D; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 15:12:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2561C37; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 15:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r0MFC5CO061890; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:12:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id r0MFC4ko061887; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:12:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:12:04 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Borja Marcos Subject: Re: RFC: Suggesting ZFS "best practices" in FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <314B600D-E8E6-4300-B60F-33D5FA5A39CF@sarenet.es> Message-ID: References: <314B600D-E8E6-4300-B60F-33D5FA5A39CF@sarenet.es> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:12:05 -0700 (MST) Cc: FreeBSD Filesystems , Scott Long , wblock@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 15:12:05 -0000 On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Borja Marcos wrote: > Hope nobody will hate me too much, but ZFS usage under FreeBSD is > still chaotic. We badly need a well proven "doctrine" in order to > avoid problems. I would like to see guidelines for at least two common scenarios: Multi-terabyte file server with multi-drive pool. Limited RAM (1G) root-on-ZFS workstation with a single disk. The first is easy with the defaults, but particular tuning could be beneficial. And would be a good place to talk about NFS on ZFS, usage of SSDs, and so on. The second is supposed to be achievable, but the specifics... These could go in the ZFS section in the Handbook. I'm interested in working on that.