From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 03:28:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66AC16A515 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:28:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vinny@tellurian.com) Received: from mail1.tellurian.net (mail1.tellurian.net [216.182.1.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A27A43D49 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:28:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vinny@tellurian.com) Received: from cactus.tellurian.com (cactus.tellurian.net [216.182.1.34]) by mail1.tellurian.net ([216.182.1.23] Tellurian Networks Mail Server version 3.7a-14) with ESMTP id 348465649 for multiple; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:28:47 -0500 Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060213222648.08a4a9a0@tellurian.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:28:47 -0500 To: Chuck Swiger From: Vinny Abello In-Reply-To: <43F14DA3.8070602@mac.com> References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060213212221.04c7da20@tellurian.com> <43F14537.8080907@mac.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20060213220336.08433b78@tellurian.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20060213221518.08c60e10@tellurian.com> <43F14DA3.8070602@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Authenticated-User: vinny@tellurian.com X-Ultimate-Internet-Connection: Tellurian Networks Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: clock reverts to epoch on boot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:28:49 -0000 At 10:25 PM 2/13/2006, Chuck Swiger wrote: >Vinny Abello wrote: >[ ... ] > > Nevermind. I just answered my own question. I should have RTFM more > > carefully. :) > >:-) > > > If CPUTYPE is defined in your /etc/make.conf, make sure to use the > > "?=" instead of the "=" assignment operator, so that buildworld can > > override the CPUTYPE if it needs to. > > > > I am thinking if I change to > > > > CPUTYPE?=pentium4 > > > > I will be ok. Does that sound correct or am I still barking up the wrong > > tree? > >If you weren't having any problems, feel free to experiment. Since you don't >gain much by using the machine-specific compiler optimizations for the kernel, >it is worth turning them off to see whether the resulting kernel still has the >same problem... Will give it a shot and see what happens. So far buildworld isn't using CPU specific optimizations with the CPUTYPE?=pentium4 as documented so I have a feeling that will fix my problem. I actually started having problems after rebuilding world from this source a second time with (what I thought) were more optimized compiler settings. Obviously not if they cause it to break. :) My kernel is the same from when it was working from the original CVSUP and original buildworld so I think I'll be ok with that. I'll rebuild it to be safe anyway though. Thanks again for your help! :) Vinny Abello Network Engineer Server Management vinny@tellurian.com (973)300-9211 x 125 (973)940-6125 (Direct) PGP Key Fingerprint: 3BC5 9A48 FC78 03D3 82E0 E935 5325 FBCB 0100 977A Tellurian Networks - The Ultimate Internet Connection http://www.tellurian.com (888)TELLURIAN "Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear - not absence of fear" -- Mark Twain