From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 1 08:44:16 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8334616A41A for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 08:44:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antik@bsd.ee) Received: from smtp-gw1.starman.ee (smtp-out3.starman.ee [85.253.0.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FACE13C458 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 08:44:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antik@bsd.ee) Received: from mx2.starman.ee (mx2.starman.ee [62.65.192.17]) by smtp-gw1.starman.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA22A21ADB for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 10:15:59 +0200 (EET) X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd-New at mx2.starman.ee Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pc65.host1.ida.starman.ee [62.65.240.65]) by mx2.starman.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9303F40A3 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 10:15:58 +0200 (EET) From: Andrei Kolu To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 10:15:57 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200712011015.58979.antik@bsd.ee> Subject: Re: Xorg meta ports bloated dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 08:44:16 -0000 Saturday 01 December 2007 05:20:40 kirjutas dexterclarke@safe-mail.net: > I've just been helping somebody through an installation of > 6.2-RELEASE and we've noticed the excessive dependencies of > the xorg meta ports. > > xorg-server 1.4, for example, depends on: > > dbus-1.0.2_2, dbus-glib-0.74, glib-2.14.2, gnome_subr-1.0, > hal-0.5.8.20070909 and even strange things like cdrtools-2.01_6. > > xorg-server 1.2 (the one distributed with the 6.2-RELEASE CD) > doesn't have these dependencies. > > Putting it bluntly: why is this crap being dragged in? Neither > of us use GNOME or anything that might require dbus. I can't see > why xorg-server could possibly need any of the above? > > Anxiously awaiting a flaming argument. > And why xorg should include ugly fonts like adobe* an type1*?