From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Apr 10 21:14:25 1996 Return-Path: owner-bugs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA04163 for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 21:14:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ki.net (root@ki.net [205.150.102.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA04158 Wed, 10 Apr 1996 21:14:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebsd.ki.net (root@freebsd.ki.net [205.150.102.51]) by ki.net (8.7.4/8.7.4) with ESMTP id AAA16106; Thu, 11 Apr 1996 00:14:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by freebsd.ki.net (8.7.5/8.7.5) with SMTP id AAA02319; Thu, 11 Apr 1996 00:14:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: freebsd.ki.net: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 00:14:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Bruce Evans cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org, hsu@clinet.fi, scrappy@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/528 In-Reply-To: <199604101934.FAA04023@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 11 Apr 1996, Bruce Evans wrote: > > Understood...reopened and responsibility changed to you. After > >reading this, I had thought that maybe making TTYHOG change with a > >change in RS_IBUFSIZE might work, except that TTYHOG is also used in > >relation to at least two other defines that I've found. > > Yes, TTYHOG is "machine-independent". Increasing it to 4K or more might > be best for sio, but then lots of memory would be wasted for ptys. > I guess that putting a TTYHOG/PTYHOG in sys/tty.h wouldn't be acceptable to circumvent this problem? I don't assume that pty's generate the error that it is we are trying to fix, so seperating the *HOG defines would make sense, no? Marc G. Fournier scrappy@ki.net Systems Administrator @ ki.net scrappy@freebsd.org