From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Feb 7 13:23:23 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA16496 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sun, 7 Feb 1999 13:23:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA16479 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 1999 13:23:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA181971532; Sun, 7 Feb 1999 10:32:12 -0500 Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1999 10:32:12 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: Brian Handy Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: MASTER_SITE_(AFTERSTEP|WINDOWMAKER)? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 5 Feb 1999, Brian Handy wrote: > I was rooting for some extra master sites for a wm app earlier, and I got > to poking through the bsd.port.mk files...and I came up with this. We've > got MASTER_SITE_GNOME, so there seems to be precedence for something like > this, and there's sure enough AS and WM apps running around the tree. So > does this seem like a reasonable thing to do? I second this patch. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message