Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 23:52:24 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Joe Schmoe <non_secure@yahoo.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.x + UFS2 exist in any way ? Message-ID: <20040617065224.GA11732@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040617064131.51499.qmail@web53306.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040617064131.51499.qmail@web53306.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:41:31PM -0700, Joe Schmoe wrote: > I need to run 4.x (currently 4.10-RELEASE) but I really want to use UFS2 = because I also need larger files and filesystems, and I really want to use = snapshots. > =20 > Is UFS2 available on 4.10 ? No. > If not, how big of a hack would it be to try to use UFS2 with 4.10-RELEA= SE ? A big one. Kris --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA0T+oWry0BWjoQKURAgffAJ9ETAFHOvr+NJm9b4mLagkEEtnGBQCgr96g h7QynwQ8veKodZPGPCWwybk= =n3xE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040617065224.GA11732>