From owner-cvs-all  Thu Sep  2 13:41:41 1999
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (ns.mt.sri.com [206.127.79.91])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E2A7715CE3; Thu,  2 Sep 1999 13:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com)
Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100])
	by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA01187;
	Thu, 2 Sep 1999 14:40:33 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com)
Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id OAA28347; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 14:40:32 -0600
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 14:40:32 -0600
Message-Id: <199909022040.OAA28347@mt.sri.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Cc: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/mkdir mkdir.1 mkdir.c 
In-Reply-To: <199909022031.NAA01109@dingo.cdrom.com>
References: <199909022031.OAA28195@mt.sri.com>
	<199909022031.NAA01109@dingo.cdrom.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid
Reply-To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams)
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> > > So we have 2 against it, 2 not in favor but acknowledged the arguments as
> > > valid, 2 don't care, and 5 for.  That makes 4 vs. 5, not to mention 100+
> > > "I don't care enough to say anything".  This hardly looks like a major
> > > force to block this -- looks like we'll go with "-v".
> > 
> > I read it differently, and I see more vocifirous 'votes' against it.
> > I'm against it, since it bloats stuff that doesn't need to be bloated
> > for 99.9% of the users.
> > 
> > KISS rules...
> 
> No, the majority rules, and so far the majority is for the change.

Not anymore.  Now it's tied. :)


Nate


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message