From owner-freebsd-current Thu Apr 8 21:26:47 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F98E14EB5; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 21:26:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) id VAA93282; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 21:21:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) From: Steve Kargl Message-Id: <199904090421.VAA93282@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: ATTENTION PLEASE: g77 in base system. In-Reply-To: <199904090155.SAA98077@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> from Satoshi - the Ports Wraith - Asami at "Apr 8, 1999 06:55:26 pm" To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - the Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 21:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Cc: obrien@NUXI.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Satoshi - the Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > * From: "David O'Brien" > > * I've only heard back from 4 folks about adding EGCS's g77 to the base > * system -- all 4 said "yes". Unless I get more feedback, I will add g77 > * to the base system this weekend. > > Sorry, I wasn't paying enough attention I guess. What's wrong with it > being a port? > > If the answer is "it's very hard to separate just the g77 > functionality into /usr/local", then count me as a yes. If it is > "some people want it in the base system", then count me as a no. > Speaking of ports, I have a working port of f2c and a new f77(1) wrapper sitting on my machine. The f2c port includes all of the FreeBSD changes to the f2c in usr/src. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message