Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 05:56:12 +0100 From: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> To: John Baldwin <john@baldwin.cx> Cc: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org>, Mark Powell <M.S.Powell@salford.ac.uk>, Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com>, Peter Schuller <peter.schuller@infidyne.com> Subject: Re: repeatable ZFS panic: share->excl Message-ID: <3bbf2fe10903122156u650417f0s5c49b68bdf4ffa07@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <29C8FA04-D5B1-49B7-ACF0-4185537367B0@baldwin.cx> References: <20090312175345.Y80227@rust.salford.ac.uk> <20090312191333.GA97342@hyperion.scode.org> <49B97617.8010709@freebsd.org> <86r6124f2v.fsf@gmail.com> <3bbf2fe10903122035i20b2767cod2322c39c6f850ee@mail.gmail.com> <29C8FA04-D5B1-49B7-ACF0-4185537367B0@baldwin.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/3/13, John Baldwin <john@baldwin.cx>: > This is similar to the patch I've asked lulf@ to test except that it is > longer and I fix a bug where zfs_lookup() can leak a vnode lock if the > access check fails. :-) The last one I sent to lulf@ is at > www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/zfs_ea.patch. I really thought zfs_lookup() was returning the lock held as a feature assming no LOCKLEAF. Is that a bug instead? Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3bbf2fe10903122156u650417f0s5c49b68bdf4ffa07>