From owner-freebsd-arch  Mon Jul 10  4: 2: 5 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CB74637B77F; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 04:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA21665;
	Mon, 10 Jul 2000 13:01:48 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: papowell@astart.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? - License Issues 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Jul 2000 03:53:52 PDT."
             <20000710035352.C92445@dragon.nuxi.com> 
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 13:01:48 +0200
Message-ID: <21663.963226908@critter.freebsd.dk>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <20000710035352.C92445@dragon.nuxi.com>, "David O'Brien" writes:
>On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 02:02:16PM -0700, papowell@astart.com wrote:
>> Let me try to state this as clearly as possible:
>> If the FreeBSD project wants to distribute LPRng under the BSD
>> license,  then I will give them a license to distribute it under
>> the BSD license terms.  I would add the following two provisions
>> in addition to standard BSD License terms:
>
>This change is absolutely great!
>
>I am now in total support of the change from the traditional LPR system
>to LPRng.  The benefits of a much more capable printing system out weigh
>the compatibility issues.

vote.yes++;

--
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message