From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 8 23:47:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40ED37B502 for ; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 23:47:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e996lBY06295; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 00:47:11 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id AAA09610; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 00:47:11 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010090647.AAA09610@harmony.village.org> To: Scott Dodson Subject: Re: Correct sequence for keeping a 4.1 system stable. Cc: Jon Paterson , "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Oct 2000 02:45:49 EDT." References: Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 00:47:11 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Scott Dodson writes: : Hmm, I don't know why. Those problems were going from 4.0 -> 4.1.1 and : going from 4.1 -> 4.1.1 on another machine. If it happened on just one : machine i wouldn't rase a question. But his is happening on both, however : of course I'm the one that's done both the machines. But i don't think : i've screwd anything else up. OK. I'll setup a system and give it a try. I thought that I had no problems when I had done it. But maybe there's some autopilot effects going on here. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message