From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 15:33:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F3116A4CE; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:33:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsdmall.com (ns1.freebsdmall.com [69.50.233.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236DD43D49; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:33:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: by mail.freebsdmall.com (Postfix, from userid 2074) id E35BB1CDA4; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 07:48:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 07:48:22 -0800 From: Murray Stokely To: "Devon H. O'Dell" Message-ID: <20050304154822.GB73740@freebsdmall.com> References: <1109866064.3932.195.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050303174802.GB40399@freebsdmall.com> <1109872907.3932.227.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050303184410.GA41781@freebsdmall.com> <1109877153.3932.243.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050303222246.GL27332@submonkey.net> <1109923917.3926.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1109923917.3926.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D cc: rwatson@FreeBSD.org cc: www@FreeBSD.org cc: gordon@tetlows.org Subject: Re: Finally, an implementation of a new FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:33:02 -0000 On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 09:11:57AM +0100, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > Awesome. Ok, if we start working in Perforce, we'll need to get Chris an > account there. Robert; Gordon, can this be set up? Perforce would be a > nice place to do it. Sounds good. I'd like to see some of the rather simple stuff make it's way into CVS sooner rather than later. There's nothing controversial or inherently experimental about changing tags into tags with appropriate CSS. That part can just be merged into CVS immediately. - Murray