From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 11 09:27:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4BC16A419 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:27:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C99A13C44B for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:27:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (ool-435559b8.dyn.optonline.net [67.85.89.184]) by mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0JUH00L2N3LT4XM0@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:27:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by flosoft.no-ip.biz (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0B9RS6d011191; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:27:28 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:27:28 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" In-reply-to: <3712.1200043508@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-id: <47873680.1000604@gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 References: <3712.1200043508@critter.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080104) Cc: Wilko Bulte , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Dominic Fandrey Subject: Re: FreeBSD's problems as seen by the BSDForen.de community X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:27:30 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <4787354C.4000803@gmail.com>, "Aryeh M. Friedman" > writes: > >> And by denying that there is an apporiate venue you (among with >> other people) have by definition made it so anyone who presents >> such a purposal will be screwed before the debate even starts... >> > > I don't waste time debating Newtons second law either. > Why because it was eventually proven incomplete by relatively? (i.e. if no one dared question it then the incorrect version of the law would still be used today and odds are there would be no computers because electronics uses modern physics and not classical) - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Developer Tools. http://www.flosoft-systems.com Developer, not business, friendly. "Free software != Free beer" Blog: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHhzaAjRvRjGmHRgQRAlSlAKCqd/ePR8reUBJszrKrkNvYgg+BMQCgoQxB fNo3ICLnNbfNcmikpJeRXAM= =lGcL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----