From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 10 19:41:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99477414; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:41:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jenkins-admin@freebsd.org) Received: from jenkins-9.freebsd.org (jenkins-9.freebsd.org [8.8.178.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86AB71B36; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:41:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jenkins-admin@freebsd.org) Received: from jenkins-9.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jenkins-9.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2044B1E3; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:41:21 +0000 (GMT) From: jenkins-admin@freebsd.org To: mjg@FreeBSD.org, br@FreeBSD.org, brooks@FreeBSD.org, marcel@FreeBSD.org, kp@FreeBSD.org, ume@FreeBSD.org, jenkins-admin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <2001648946.112.1433965282863.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-9.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1710009091.108.1433944032889.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-9.freebsd.org> References: <1710009091.108.1433944032889.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-9.freebsd.org> Subject: FreeBSD_HEAD - Build #2849 - Fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Jenkins-Job: FreeBSD_HEAD X-Jenkins-Result: SUCCESS Precedence: bulk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:41:25 -0000 FreeBSD_HEAD - Build #2849 - Fixed: Check console output at https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD/2849/ to view the results. From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 10 20:14:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAA614FD for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 20:14:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca (esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F621304 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 20:14:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2A9BABwmXhV/95baINchEmDGKx4jXYJgVKFfwqBdxQBAQEBAQEBgQqETIELAg0ZAl+IQZ5jj1+kCQEKAQEBHoEhjnSDI4FFBZB7pgAkggkdgW4igXeBAQEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,589,1427774400"; d="scan'208";a="215390780" Received: from muskoka.cs.uoguelph.ca (HELO zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca) ([131.104.91.222]) by esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 10 Jun 2015 16:13:59 -0400 Received: from zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C28B4172 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:13:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:13:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem To: freebsd current Message-ID: <1249942556.55526194.1433967239788.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> Subject: setting tunables in stable/10 vs head? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.17.95.11] X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.2.6_GA_2926 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Win)/7.2.6_GA_2926) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 20:14:07 -0000 Hi, I just MFC'd a patch from head to stable/10 that defines some tunables using CTLFLAG_RDTUN. Although the MFC didn't break anything, the tunables don't get changed by the values in /boot/loader.conf. By applying a patch like this: SYSCTL_DECL(_vfs_nfsd); int nfsrv_statehashsize = NFSSTATEHASHSIZE; +TUNABLE_INT("vfs.nfsd.statehashsize", &nfsrv_statehashsize); SYSCTL_INT(_vfs_nfsd, OID_AUTO, statehashsize, CTLFLAG_RDTUN, &nfsrv_statehashsize, 0, "Size of state hash table set via loader.conf"); they get set ok. So, is this correct or have I done something stupid? And, if it correct, do I commit a patch like the above directly to stable/10. (It seems that TUNABLE_INT() is discouraged for -head.) Thanks for any help with this, rick