From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 12 10:26:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AE216A4CE for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:26:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8C543F85 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:26:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 655703528A; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 14:24:50 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD1E343F2; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 14:24:50 -0400 (AST) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 14:24:50 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Alex Povolotsky In-Reply-To: <20031112133401.7b4eb3a3.tarkhil@webmail.sub.ru> Message-ID: <20031112142351.U56037@ganymede.hub.org> References: <200311112020.hABKKmEg098822@lurza.secnetix.de> <20031112133401.7b4eb3a3.tarkhil@webmail.sub.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel panic on jailed sshd - 4.9-release X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:26:56 -0000 On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Alex Povolotsky wrote: > On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:49:44 -0400 (AST) > "Marc G. Fournier" wrote: > > MGF> ... and it doesn't even come close to addressing the problem, and > MGF> that is that in 4.8, he didn't have this problem, while in 4.9, he > MGF> does ... is there something different in sshd that is causing this? > MGF> I'm running > MGF> 4.9-PRERELEASE from Sept 20th, and all my servers have been solid, > MGF> and sshd is used extensively ... > > I'm getting EXACTLY the same in 4.8-RELEASE. It IS nullfs-related :-( There were actually *alot* of fixes to uniofs since 4.8-RELEASE was done ... not sure how/if any of them would affect NULLFS though ... Are you able to get a core dump from the system, that can be looked at?