Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:42:42 +0400 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG> To: John Birrell <jb@what-creek.com> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, Kip Macy <kmacy@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf Makefile.sun4v files.sun4v options.sun4v src/sys/sun4v/compile .cvsignore src/sys/sun4v/conf DEFAULTS GENERIC GENERIC.hints MAC Makefile NOTES src/sys/sun4v/include _bus.h _inttypes.h _limits.h _stdint.h _types.h asi.h asm.h ... Message-ID: <20061005074242.GB31825@rambler-co.ru> In-Reply-To: <20061005072924.GA86424@what-creek.com> References: <200610050614.k956ETAn082623@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061005072924.GA86424@what-creek.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 07:29:24AM +0000, John Birrell wrote: > There is a binutils update required to -current before sun4v will build > out of the box. It seems we have a problem being able to make non-vendor > branch commits to GNU tools just to support building a new arch. This is > a bit disappointing. Surely we should be able to handle taking one or > two files off the vendor branch on the odd occasion we add a significant > new arch! >=20 We've been handling this in GCC and BU by using local patches. This way, it's much easier for their FreeBSD maintainers. I agree though that committing something into our Binutils *does* take time. ;-) Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFJLdyqRfpzJluFF4RAheuAJ4mUzv3E8V0MrZ7IhbXfO0XJhOBjgCgkWz9 mQS7iVuF1UFM+2l+85BcO7g= =42Xa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061005074242.GB31825>