From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 18 16:39:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B0E16A4CE for ; Wed, 18 May 2005 16:39:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from people.fsn.hu (people.fsn.hu [195.228.252.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6107B43D48 for ; Wed, 18 May 2005 16:39:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bra@fsn.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by people.fsn.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC0284418 for ; Wed, 18 May 2005 18:39:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from people.fsn.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (people.fsn.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 86264-02-5 for ; Wed, 18 May 2005 18:39:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [172.16.129.72] (japan.t-online.co.hu [195.228.243.99]) by people.fsn.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BC48441F for ; Wed, 18 May 2005 18:39:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <428B6FC1.3000907@fsn.hu> Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 18:39:29 +0200 From: Attila Nagy User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050325) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fsn.hu Subject: FreeBSD on dual core Opterons - stupid buildworld test X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 16:39:52 -0000 Hello, I did some buildworld tests on an HP BL45p with 4 2,2 GHz Opterons. Sequential time make buildworld -jX times (if there is a missing iteration, then the build has failed): 4BSD: BUILDING WITH -j1 1725.073u 645.453s 37:50.03 104.4% 4084+2935k 1725+3896io 385pf+0w BUILDING WITH -j2 1764.483u 1020.054s 17:36.07 263.6% 3987+2766k 1735+3748io 385pf+0w BUILDING WITH -j3 1806.182u 1564.830s 13:38.53 411.8% 3926+2605k 1741+3939io 385pf+0w BUILDING WITH -j4 1827.213u 1781.092s 12:31.84 479.9% 3900+2559k 1736+3847io 385pf+0w BUILDING WITH -j5 1832.213u 1942.488s 12:13.05 514.9% 3862+2522k 1731+3838io 385pf+0w BUILDING WITH -j6 1844.549u 2054.711s 11:56.27 544.3% 3855+2489k 1727+3868io 385pf+0w BUILDING WITH -j7 1849.804u 2156.657s 11:45.74 567.6% 3828+2460k 1751+3831io 385pf+0w BUILDING WITH -j8 1859.690u 2208.954s 11:49.85 573.1% 3832+2447k 1755+3866io 385pf+0w BUILDING WITH -j9 1855.253u 2245.942s 11:55.85 572.9% 3825+2428k 1755+3845io 385pf+0w BUILDING WITH -j10 1867.634u 2258.330s 12:00.68 572.5% 3818+2441k 1743+3943io 385pf+0w BUILDING WITH -j11 1858.855u 2302.655s 12:06.67 572.6% 3806+2418k 1740+4094io 456pf+0w BUILDING WITH -j13 1863.750u 2319.476s 12:06.90 575.4% 3794+2411k 1753+3999io 391pf+0w BUILDING WITH -j14 1859.940u 2318.790s 12:07.43 574.4% 3795+2409k 1740+4112io 385pf+0w BUILDING WITH -j15 1862.859u 2329.179s 12:10.75 573.6% 3789+2396k 1744+4261io 385pf+0w ULE: BUILDING WITH -j1 1685.692u 532.736s 36:36.58 100.9% 4200+3011k 1983+3727io 385pf+0w BUILDING WITH -j2 1741.276u 834.259s 17:58.30 238.8% 4124+2871k 1831+4111io 385pf+0w BUILDING WITH -j3 1769.405u 1113.314s 14:19.19 335.5% 4087+2767k 1850+4065io 385pf+0w BUILDING WITH -j4 1788.789u 1243.970s 13:16.23 380.8% 4063+2731k 1759+4202io 385pf+0w BUILDING WITH -j5 1797.793u 1363.709s 12:49.00 411.1% 4037+2688k 1762+4169io 385pf+0w http://people.fsn.hu/~bra/bl45p/acpidump http://people.fsn.hu/~bra/bl45p/dmesg.boot http://people.fsn.hu/~bra/bl45p/pciconf It is interesting that the CPU usage couldn't exceed 575 percent... But HP says that dual core increases performance about 75 percent, so given that this machine had 4 CPUs it is seems OK :) -- Attila Nagy e-mail: Attila.Nagy@fsn.hu Adopt a directory on our free software phone @work: +361 371 3536 server! http://www.fsn.hu/?f=brick cell.: +3630 306 6758