From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 17 15:39:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D7916A407; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 15:39:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CFC43D45; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 15:39:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBHFdE5f030121; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 18:39:14 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kBHFdEgn030120; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 18:39:14 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 18:39:14 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov To: Robert Watson Message-ID: <20061217153914.GA30048@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Robert Watson , current@FreeBSD.org References: <20061216055903.GA2712@nagual.pp.ru> <20061216111656.GA7501@nagual.pp.ru> <20061216112117.P72986@fledge.watson.org> <20061216114426.GA7735@nagual.pp.ru> <20061216120746.E72986@fledge.watson.org> <20061216125136.GA1094@nagual.pp.ru> <20061216125419.J72986@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061216125419.J72986@fledge.watson.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sysv_ipc.c broken in v1.30 (was Re: sysvshm appearse broken in -current) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 15:39:42 -0000 On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 01:00:56PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: > As I said, this is something that I hope to revisit in the next few days. > However, it would be helpful if you could tell me the arguments and call > path to the ipcperm() function instance that's generating the improper > failure. It could be that both a bug in ipcperm() and a big in shmget() This is kernel debug running test from t-shm.c which fails (from root). Is it what you need? acc_mode 0x1b0 owner obj_mode 0x9b0 dac_granted 0x1180 priv_granted 0x0 EACCES -- http://ache.pp.ru/