Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:20:27 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: "Manuel Gebele" <forensixs@gmx.de> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD DAQ Card Facility [DCF] Message-ID: <863a5dt5ec.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20091021100451.98450@gmx.net> (Manuel Gebele's message of "Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:04:51 %2B0200") References: <20091021100451.98450@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Manuel Gebele" <forensixs@gmx.de> writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > > I would have just called it DAQ, which as you know is an established > > abbreviation for "Data Acquisition". [...] > I have no objection to that naming. Maybe I should call it just > ``FreeBSD DAQ Facility'' (FDF). I don't understand why it has to be so complicated. What's wrong with just "DAQ"? (not that any of this really matters in the big picture...) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?863a5dt5ec.fsf>