From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 24 06:57:53 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332E616A4CE
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 24 May 2004 06:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.errors.firstcallgroup.co.uk
	(mail.errors.firstcallgroup.co.uk [213.167.69.198])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68B443D1F
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 24 May 2004 06:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from petefrench@keithprowse.com)
Received: from smaug.rattatosk ([172.16.1.8])
	by mail.errors.firstcallgroup.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.22)
	id 1BSFxA-000OwQ-8S; Mon, 24 May 2004 14:57:20 +0100
Received: from [172.16.1.6] (helo=dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk)
	by smaug.rattatosk with esmtp (Exim 4.22)
	id 1BSFx9-000AAx-Ve; Mon, 24 May 2004 14:57:19 +0100
Received: from petefrench by dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim
	4.32; FreeBSD)	id 1BSFx9-000LBv-V5; Mon, 24 May 2004 14:57:19 +0100
To: petefrench@keithprowse.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, veldy@veldy.net
In-Reply-To: <001a01c44196$544870f0$321d590a@nic.target.com>
Message-Id: <E1BSFx9-000LBv-V5@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
From: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 14:57:19 +0100
Subject: Re: Problems with 4.10 and mysql
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 13:57:53 -0000

> Do you run a firewall (ipfw) on that machine?  Perhaps you are hitting
> stateful connection limits?

Nope, its just straight out of the box with no firewall. Also the
connections are local (the scripts run on the same machine). It
worked fine under 4.9 - though someone else has said they have seen
the same beahviout under 4.9

-pcf.