From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 23 10:42:12 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1421F16A4CE
	for <hubs@freebsd.org>; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:42:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blake.polstra.com (blake.polstra.com [64.81.189.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E303343D9F
	for <hubs@freebsd.org>; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:41:14 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jdp@polstra.com)
Received: from strings.polstra.com (dsl081-189-067.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net
	[64.81.189.67])
	by blake.polstra.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0NIdfIq025076;
	Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:39:41 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from jdp@polstra.com)
Message-ID: <XFMail.20040123103941.jdp@polstra.com>
X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20040123183449.GA3020@eeyore.local.dohd.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:39:41 -0800 (PST)
From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
To: Mark Huizer <freebsd@dohd.org>
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.396099, version=0.14.5
cc: hubs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: -s for cvsup on mirrors?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp <freebsd-hubs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hubs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hubs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hubs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hubs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hubs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hubs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:42:12 -0000

On 23-Jan-2004 Mark Huizer wrote:
>> > Is it feasible to use the -s option as an argument for cvsup in
>> > update.sh?
>> 
>> Yes, I recommend it.  Just make sure you never muck around with the
>> files on the mirror.
> 
> OK, just changed that, but why isn't that added to 
> /usr/ports/net/cvsup-mirror then?

Because I wanted people to think carefully about their
responsibilities before they enabled it. :-)

John