From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 24 22:05:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC57116A415 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:05:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mse_software@charter.net) Received: from mxsf40.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf40.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5F943D46 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:05:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mse_software@charter.net) Received: from mxip14a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip14a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.144]) by mxsf40.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8OM5obW002989 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:05:51 -0400 Received: from 71-92-102-230.dhcp.knwk.wa.charter.com (HELO yak.mseubanks.net) ([71.92.102.230]) by mxip14a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2006 18:05:51 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,210,1157342400"; d="scan'208"; a="87794390:sNHT26092356" From: Michael Eubanks To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:05:48 -0700 Message-Id: <1159135548.746.34.camel@yak.mseubanks.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Patches for jail support of multiple IPs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mse_software@charter.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:05:52 -0000 On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 12:51 -0700, Chris wrote: > Are there any official patches to support multiple IPs in jails or > would I be limited to taking a chance with the few 6.1 patch files > I've found on the net. I searched the UPDATING on HEAD and for > anything that might be related but found nothing. Everything I could > google on the subject led me to sources that didn't appear to be > related to the project. I'm suspicious of using patches being > developed outside of the freebsd community yet I'd really hoped to > move to a completely jailed OS for our servers. Is it just too soon > to be looking for this capability in a production capacity? > Just a quick addition. I don't think you'd even need multiple divert sockets unless you have multiple interfaces on the external and/or internal sides. Depends on what your setup looks like and what you're trying to accomplish. -Michael S. Eubanks mse_software@charter.net