From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jul 28 10:56:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151CD14D51 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 1999 10:56:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id CAA01514; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 02:55:57 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <379F4390.950D08FA@newsguy.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 02:53:20 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garrett Wollman Cc: Brian Dean , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysinstall network performance References: <199907281524.LAA61875@dean.pc.sas.com> <199907281539.LAA09614@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Garrett Wollman wrote: > > < said: > > > During recent installs using the 7/26 snap, I noticed that the > > transfer rate for the "ports" distribution was about twice as fast as > > SNAPs from the beginning of the month. > > > I was wondering what to attribute this better performance to. Could > > this be due to the new network driver / newbus integration? > > Jordan stopped including CVS directories in the /usr/ports tarball. I don't think a transfer rate can be affected by that, though the total transfer time certainly would. Anyway... Jordan did it? Thanks God! -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Is it true that you're a millionaire's son who never worked a day in your life?" "Yeah, I guess so." "Lemme tell you, son, you ain't missed a thing." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message