Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Mar 1995 19:57:32 +0100 (MET)
From:      J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD bugs list)
Subject:   Re: edit-pr
Message-ID:  <199503211857.TAA03175@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <24168.795802439@freefall.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Mar 21, 95 08:13:59 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> 
> > Well, Jordan doesn't like our solutions, he would rather waste programmers
> > time :-).
> 
> Sheesh!  OK, OK, I surrender.  Orthogonality means nothing.  The
> traditional UNIX command behavior of taking or OR MORE arguments is
> bogus. I'll just crawl back in my little hole now! :-)

I've also stumpled across this.  The worst at all: edit-pr doesn't
even bomb me with something like ``usage: hey you are stupid that you
are, don't gimme more than one argument'', it silently does what i
think is wrong -- just picking the first one only and pretending it's
all right.

Where's the source for edit-pr?  Should go into CVS?  Pleeze, put
it into CVS somewhere.  Rather than complaining i'd go to fix it.

Perhaps we need a third CVS repository (besides src and ports),
something where we can drop our development stuff that's not actually
intended to be shipped along with the system.  I've already been
seeking for such a place for my easy-import script.

What about `devel'?  Should be shipped to the CVS suppers/ctmers, but
not go into the regular distribution.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199503211857.TAA03175>