From owner-cvs-all Fri Sep 14 0: 8:35 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from ns.plaut.de (ns.plaut.de [194.99.75.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F15E37B410; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 00:08:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ns.plaut.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id JAA93381; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:08:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root@nihil.plaut.de) Received: from localhost (root@localhost) by nihil.plaut.de (8.11.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id f8E77Kf02163; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:07:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root@nihil) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:07:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Reifenberger To: Bruce Evans Cc: , Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/modules Makefile src/sys/modules/ext2fs Makefile In-Reply-To: <20010914090900.G14616-100000@delplex.bde.org> Message-ID: <20010914085632.P1270-100000@nihil> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Bruce Evans wrote: ... > This module was intentionally not supplied due to copyright issues. > I think its OK iff it is not built for releases. I didn't know the PR. ... Is there a NO_RELEASE or RESTRICTED knob for Makefiles I can use or could I conditionalize for make RELEASE or shall I comment out the ext2fs line in the modules/Makefile? On the other side the copyright issues (isn't it the GPL) shouldnt apply for modules since they are not bound to BSD copyrighted software or am I wrong? Bye! ---- Michael Reifenberger ^.*Plaut.*$, IT, R/3 Basis, GPS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message