Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:11:51 -0500 From: Mike Meyer <mwm-dated-1050873111.1fb636@mired.org> To: Wayne Pascoe <freebsd@penguinpowered.org.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: John <agent007=email-agents.com@spamarrest.com> Message-ID: <16028.30103.45151.86031@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <20030415211401.GA11799@marvin.penguinpowered.org.uk> References: <20030415192000.GA11033@marvin.penguinpowered.org.uk> <20030415205020.GA39014@keyslapper.org> <20030415211401.GA11799@marvin.penguinpowered.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In <20030415211401.GA11799@marvin.penguinpowered.org.uk>, Wayne Pascoe <freebsd@penguinpowered.org.uk> typed: > The purpose of this list is for FreeBSD users to support each other. > While I do ask a fair amount of questions, I'm also trying to answer > questions more. But if every post is going to result in spam, where is > people's incentive to support each other? As far as I can tell, it's not every post - it's just the ones that are CC'd to a user of spamalert. The posts I've made that weren't to John didn't generate those notices. Since I use a confirmation/whitelist system myself, I can't really object to strongly to what he's doing. I do find the work required of the sender a bit excessive. I hope John has subscribed to the list so he can read the answers I made to his postings. <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16028.30103.45151.86031>