Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 07 Feb 2010 09:49:54 +0100
From:      Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>
To:        perryh@pluto.rain.com
Cc:        guru@unixarea.de, m.seaman@black-earth.co.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: backup terminal title
Message-ID:  <4B6E7EB2.7040408@bsdforen.de>
In-Reply-To: <4B6E6F24.3090609@bsdforen.de>
References:  <4B6D62B3.4070702@bsdforen.de>	<20100206125554.GA2173@current.Sisis.de>	<4B6D74EF.2090106@bsdforen.de> <4B6D80F3.7050707@black-earth.co.uk>	<4B6D8377.1090005@bsdforen.de> <4B6D9B6B.40800@bsdforen.de>	<4b6e2885.uAuY%2Ba00oT7AqSzy%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4B6E6F24.3090609@bsdforen.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote:
>>> I wish to use  the "\033]0;%s\007" sequence in a shell-script to
>>> set the title of a terminal. But only if I am able to undo it.
>>>
>>> My requirement is that this must be done without using anything
>>> outside the base system.
>> There is an escape sequence which will cause the terminal to echo
>> back its current title, but it's a bit tricky to use given only
>> base-system tools because the echo ends with, IIRC, \007 rather
>> than \n.  It may be possible in some shells to temporarily set the
>> line-end character to \007.  You probably also want to (somehow)
>> cover problematic cases like terminals that don't reply to the
>> inquiry even though TERMCAP implies that they should.
> 
> That actually doesn't sound tricky at all, remember that the
> original sequence to change the title also ends with \007.
> Where can I find this magical sequence?
> 
> I've been trying to read:
> http://www.xfree86.org/current/ctlseqs.html
> 
> But the Syntax is really cryptic.

I finally got it:

printf "\033[22;0t"
	This stores the current icon and window titles on a stack.
printf "\033[23;0t"
	This restores them from the stack.

It works fine with xterm, has no effect on rxvt-unicode (which I
am using), though.

That might well be a termcap problem. I've got to look into this.

-- 
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B6E7EB2.7040408>