Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 07:50:51 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Unable to build most gnome ports Message-ID: <20030519145051.5846C5D04@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: Message from Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> <1053308846.89162.17.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> > Date: 18 May 2003 21:47:27 -0400 > > > --=-Alg6/W4IkLM+J1Tw4C4y > Content-Type: text/plain > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Sun, 2003-05-18 at 21:39, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-05-18 at 19:18, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > After having gnumeric2 produce many Gtk errors, I decided to rebuild all > > > of the dependencies of Gnumeric. This failed as pkgconfig would not > > > build. I tried rebuilding gettext, but that didn't help. A large > > > number of other ports have the same problem and will not build. > > > > > > The error occurs before anything is compiled and I can cd to the > > > pkgconfig-0.15.0 directory and it seems to compile, so I suspect that > > > this is an issue with the FreeBSD port. Any ideas? > > > > Since no one else is complaining about this, and all ports build both on > > bento as well as my build machine, I can only assume there is an issue > > with your gettext port/make.conf/environment. Do a make configure in > > /usr/ports/devel/gettext. Then look at work/gettext-0.11.5/config.h. > > You should see: > > > > /* Define if you have the `stpcpy' function. */ > > /* #undef HAVE_STPCPY */ > > > > This indicates the system does not contain stpcpy, and thus, gettext > > needs to build its own copy. If you see HAVE_STPCPY is defined, then > > you need to look at config.log to see why it's defined. You should see: > > > > configure:9184: checking for stpcpy > > configure:9221: cc -o conftest -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro > > -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib conftest.c >&5 > > /tmp/ccPEUbzg.o: In function `main': > > /tmp/ccPEUbzg.o(.text+0x9): undefined reference to `stpcpy' > > configure:9224: $? =3D 1 > > configure: failed program was: > > ... > > > > In any event, my libintl.so does not contain any stpcpy symbol. > > However, my libgettextlib.so does, but it's an internally defined > > symbol: > > > > 00008e24 T stpcpy > > I take it back. -CURRENT does have stpcpy. Make sure you do not have > NOLIBC_R defined in /etc/make.conf, and that libc.so is up-to-date. The only things in my make.conf are NO_LPR, NOPROFILE, NO_SENDMAIL and the Perl stuff. My libc.so.5 is current as of May 8. Kernels built since then consistently crash, so I am currently unable to upgrade. I looked at config.h and it says that I have stpcpy. The config.log file shows the same: configure:9184: checking for stpcpy configure:9221: cc -o conftest -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib conftest.c >&5 configure:9224: $? = 0 configure:9227: test -s conftest configure:9230: $? = 0 configure:9240: result: yes I can't imagine where the compile is finding stpcpy if it's not in libc.so. I'm suspicious that I have some left-over cruft that is causing this, although I can't imagine what it might be. Thanks! R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030519145051.5846C5D04>