From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 5 11:27:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5B3106566C for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:27:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.ipv6.droso.net [IPv6:2001:6c8:6:c:20d:56ff:fe6f:f935]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380CE8FC08 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 11:27:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 64BAD1CC6C; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 13:27:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 13:27:29 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing To: Juergen Lock Message-ID: <20090705112728.GC86673@droso.net> References: <200907032226.n63MQ7wq045645@pointyhat.freebsd.org> <200907042034.n64KYONY099475@triton.kn-bremen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KHHg66sM3ACL179N" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200907042034.n64KYONY099475@triton.kn-bremen.de> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 7.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: INDEX build failed for 8.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:27:31 -0000 --KHHg66sM3ACL179N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 10:34:24PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote: >=20 > ..anyone happen to know why it got only the flash-related > patches here (Mk/bsd.linux-apps.mk ftp/linux-f10-curl/Makefile > linux-f10-flashplugin10/{Makefile,distinfo}) but not the new > ports (security/linux-f10-cyrus-sasl2 and net/linux-f10-openldap)? > I mean I certainly committed the new ports first... :) >=20 Probably some fluke in the way the tree is synchronized where, as it would seem, new files arrive later than modified files. I've seen similar errors before, but it's too entangled to pinpoint the exact cause. Cheers, -erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing (o_ _o) http://droso.org \\\_\ /_/// The rest is silence <____) (____> erwin@lansing.dk --KHHg66sM3ACL179N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFKUI4gqy9aWxUlaZARAoM7AKDyvuPtCQjtscVlfBaQBLmr5oha4gCg9AUO VJAcR9xGLprgsYAZNhuAC+g= =YkZ/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KHHg66sM3ACL179N--