From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 11 22:40:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from iguana.aciri.org (iguana.aciri.org [192.150.187.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4DE37B491; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 22:40:14 -0800 (PST) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by iguana.aciri.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f1C6e4R76338; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 22:40:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo) From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <200102120640.f1C6e4R76338@iguana.aciri.org> Subject: Re: BRIDGE breaks ARP? In-Reply-To: from Vincent Poy at "Feb 11, 2001 8:36:50 pm" To: vince@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET (Vincent Poy) Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 22:40:04 -0800 (PST) Cc: rizzo@aciri.org, ishizuka@ish.org, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > Pardon me, but what bridging code are you using ? Is it from Etinc > > or it is the std FreeBSD bridging code ? > > I'm not sure if the bridging code is from ET or if it's the > standard FreeBSD but it seems to be standard FreeBSD bridging code. the output from /var/log/dmesg.boot should clarify this. cheers luigi > root@oahu [8:24pm][/usr/temp/zebra] >> ifconfig bg0 > bg0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet 216.235.44.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 216.235.44.255 > inet 216.235.45.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 216.235.45.255 > inet 216.235.56.193 netmask 0xffffffe0 broadcast 216.235.56.223 > ether 00:00:00:03:00:00 > > I've asked Dennis at ETinc the question and his response was: > > if you want to route from one DLCI to the other then you have to put them > in separate bridge groups with their own subnet. You are creating isolated > segments with the ipmap functionality...the mechanism is designed for end > users who get 1 or 2 addresses. > > You COULD fix the O/S to route back to the same interface, but I dont know > how complicated that would be. I dont think there is an easy way to > disable > split-horizon. > > Dennis > > > Cheers, > Vince - vince@WURLDLINK.NET - Vice President ________ __ ____ > Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | / |[__ ] > WurldLink Corporation / / / / | / | __] ] > San Francisco - Honolulu - Hong Kong / / / / / |/ / | __] ] > HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____] > Almighty1@IRC - oahu.DAL.NET Hawaii's DALnet IRC Network Server Admin > > > > > I'm not sure if this is related but we're using FreeBSD with a > > > Emerging Technologies T1 card to do ADSL Bridging and ran into a problem > > > where for example, if a bridge group was like... > > > > > > 216.235.44.1 255.255.255.0 > > > > > > All the nodes 216.235.44.2-254 can see 216.235.44.1 fine but it > > > nothing in 216.235.44.2 - 254 can see each other. It seems to be they > > > can't see each other if they are in the same subnet. So it seems all > > > machines in the bridge group can see the gateway and the rest of the > > > world but not each other. Is there a way around this? This is with > > > 4.1-RELEASE, 4.1.1-RELEASE and even 4.2-RELEASE. > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Vince - vince@WURLDLINK.NET - Vice President ________ __ ____ > > > Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | / |[__ ] > > > WurldLink Corporation / / / / | / | __] ] > > > San Francisco - Honolulu - Hong Kong / / / / / |/ / | __] ] > > > HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____] > > > Almighty1@IRC - oahu.DAL.NET Hawaii's DALnet IRC Network Server Admin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message