From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 26 18:50:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DA91065675 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:50:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe05.swip.net [212.247.154.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD7D8FC14 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:50:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=NpnstxDL3QMA:10 a=P3SC899gXHkOLDnkTYxLZw==:17 a=zkbCd-Gl75RIpY1GmdAA:9 a=KRsg__IaYuh3YOCLOWYA:7 a=NpBZpcmwSUhObGYjgP31pUwQwpIA:4 a=uUJxoyS3JVsA:10 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 Received: from [62.113.133.240] (account mc467741@c2i.net [62.113.133.240] verified) by mailfe05.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.6) with ESMTPA id 1053428968; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:50:50 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: Michael Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:53:03 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <492D6E0D.7020500@bindone.de> <200811261734.27627.hselasky@c2i.net> <492D8A71.10709@bindone.de> In-Reply-To: <492D8A71.10709@bindone.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200811261953.04517.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Device IDs for HP hs2300 HSDPA modem X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:50:53 -0000 On Wednesday 26 November 2008, Michael wrote: > Sorry, this contains some off-topic questions, maybe you have answers > anyway... > > Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > On Wednesday 26 November 2008, Michael wrote: > >> Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > >>> On Wednesday 26 November 2008, Michael wrote: > >>>> + > >>>> + /* OEM Sierra MC8775 */ > >>>> + {{ USB_VENDOR_HP, USB_PRODUCT_HP_HS2300 > >>>> }, U3GSP_UMTS, U3GFL_NONE }, // XXX > >>>> + > >>> > >>> The ID table in USB2 has been moved to: > >>> > >>> core/usb2_msctest.c > >>> > >>> --HPS > >> > >> When? I have a 10 day old checkout here, and the sierra wireless device > >> appears in core/usbdevs, include/usb2_devid.h include/usb2_devtable.h > >> and serial/ugensa2.c. Any hint were to find details about what to put > >> where (seems like amoving target :) > > > > Do you have serial/u3g2.c ? > > > > --HPS > > Nope. I used csup to get HEAD on the 15th. CVSWeb says that u3g2.c has > been checked in 33 hours ago. I would assume that using cvs isn't really > recommended for current anymore. What is the best way to follow current > nowadays (SVN/perforce)? My problem is, that I'm actually performing > work on this machine, so I'm not too keen to upgrade constantly (but I > required current for various devices) and usb1 works okay right now. So > maybe somebody can just bring in the devive ids into current that are > proven to work in USB1 (which works okay for me right now), since > obviously I'm not authorized to submit changes anyway - if I have some > extra time I might checkout the usb2 changes of the last couple of > weeks and test if it actually works with this device entry and report > back to you. Who is repsonsible for checking in the patches to usb1? Hi Michael, I think SVN is more up to date. Just give it some time and CVS will be updated aswell. > > Btw, are there any advantages of using USB2 in terms of power management > on a laptop (even with no external devices attached)? Not yet. Probably I will add some simple power management support after new-year. Be aware that many USB devices have broken suspend/resume support and can fail, so leaving the power on is sometimes better. When no devices are attached, I am going to add support so that the HC is turned off. That will save some power. Remember that suspend/resume cycles introduce extra latency getting the system up and running again. > (this might > actually motivate me to play a little bit more with it - right now the > overall power consumption is about 40% higher compared to using products > made in Redmond). > I'm also developing a special acpi driver for HP > machines right now I will most likely submit in a few weeks. Do you > think it is appropriate to submit this to freebsd-acpi for review? Yes, and CC "Nate Lawson " --HPS