From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 18 06:15:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B1116A41C for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 06:15:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8D243D48 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 06:15:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BCA60F3; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:15:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B99C60F2; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:15:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 98EBC33C23; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:15:28 +0200 (CEST) To: Mike Tancsa References: <6.2.1.2.0.20050412220212.055c5d48@64.7.153.2> <867jj5wyvf.fsf@xps.des.no> <6.2.1.2.0.20050617141056.03ea3830@64.7.153.2> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:15:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.0.20050617141056.03ea3830@64.7.153.2> (Mike Tancsa's message of "Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:15:24 -0400") Message-ID: <86hdfwi41r.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -5.2/5.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on tim.des.no Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ichwd fixes / patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 06:15:36 -0000 Mike Tancsa writes: > Any chance to commit the patches in the above PR ? I know its not > ideal, but at least it works where as its currently 100% broken in > the tree. That's the problem: the patch *doesn't* work. I need to sit down with the docs and painstakingly check everything and figure out why. > As to the issue of the ICH6 stuff, looking through the LINUX lists, it > seems a lot of ICH6 MBs dont actually hookup the onboard watchdog for > some reason. I know. The ichwd driver has logic to detect that. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no