Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:19:14 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman <matthew@cryptosphere.com> To: Geert Hendrickx <geert.hendrickx@ua.ac.be> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mail Message-ID: <20040617101914.GB15478@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20040616153648.GA77456@lori.mine.nu> References: <40D023A1.8090009@cs.uiowa.edu> <20040616140305.GD32001@millerlite.local.mark-and-erika.com> <20040616145305.GB15913@ei.bzerk.org> <20040616153648.GA77456@lori.mine.nu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 05:36:49PM +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> Btw, can anyone of the sendmail-guru's tell me how sendmail compares perf=
ormancewise? =20
It's not a stellar performer, but it does the job. Configuration may
be a black art, but with sendmail there will always be some
incantation that can get it to deal with whatever weird e-mail setup
you can imagine.
For a high traffic mailserver, I'd probably go with postfix.
Cheers,
Matthew
--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks
Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK
--s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFA0XAiiD657aJF7eIRAn5MAJ9wVd8/W7jJydEfUwNbeioqz8/78gCeIXFN
yEQevfAnCIrAdPG4SJ/gHwM=
=dvu4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040617101914.GB15478>