From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 13 14:08:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D96D16A40F for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:08:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EC743D45 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:08:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192CB1FFDD4; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:08:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 6ED831FFDD7; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:08:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C32444888; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:08:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:08:10 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Vivek Khera In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20061013140750.W2469@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <452E2151.80500@suutari.iki.fi> <86hcy9zc1h.fsf@sparrow.local> <3FE17199-C351-4C29-AC36-7A94F344C135@khera.org> <86mz81xj3q.fsf@sparrow.local> <8664epxi0s.fsf@sparrow.local> <452F277D.4010506@suutari.iki.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: carp0 interface goes down on 6.2-PRERELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:08:26 -0000 On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Vivek Khera wrote: > > On Oct 13, 2006, at 1:43 AM, Ari Suutari wrote: > >> a kernel implementation. It doesn't require both nodes to >> be alive when the system starts, if there is only one system and >> it doesn't hear advertisements from anyone, it goes to MASTER >> state after a while. > > This has been my experience. If both systems are rebooted, and one does not > come back up, the other is active as MASTER. yes luckily. Else nothing would work;) -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT