Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 09 May 2009 14:25:36 +0100
From:      Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
To:        Jos Chrispijn <jos@webrz.net>
Cc:        Lars Eighner <luvbeastie@larseighner.com>, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Perl upgrade
Message-ID:  <4A058450.2020606@infracaninophile.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4A058193.6040703@webrz.net>
References:  <4A05637C.1040005@webrz.net>	<20090509064241.W51488@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> <4A058193.6040703@webrz.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigEF7760AE0840880AF5358633
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jos Chrispijn wrote:
> Lars Eighner wrote:
>> On Sat, 9 May 2009, Jos Chrispijn wrote:

>> The process described in UPDATING for upgrading to Perl 5.10 is=20
>> relatively
>> painless compared to previous perl upgrades.  So much stuff depends up=
on
>> perl that:

> Do you recommend having Perl updated or should I stay with 5.8?

I've updated a number of machines to perl-5.10, and apart from the sheer
amount of stuff that needs re-installing it has been virtually painless.

Most publicly available perl modules are written to be compatible with
perl-5.8.3 or later and unless you're being bitten by some version specif=
ic
bug there's no really pressing reason to upgrade to 5.10 right now.  On
the other hand, neither is there any really pressing reason /not/ to upgr=
ade.
It's all down to personal preference.

However, I expect the consensus on the minimum supported version to chang=
e
over time and more use to be made of 5.10 specific features, so I'd certa=
inly
recommend installing brand new machines with perl-5.10 in order to minimi=
ze
the potential for future pain.

	Cheers,

	Matthew

--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                   7 Priory Courtyard
                                                  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey     Ramsgate
                                                  Kent, CT11 9PW


--------------enigEF7760AE0840880AF5358633
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEAREIAAYFAkoFhFcACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwiwwCghKsCx5nblyMP8huosuRqLb0M
WHUAnjZMgHMtwatKK4Sws6GpNt7ukpkG
=KqcO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigEF7760AE0840880AF5358633--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A058450.2020606>