From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 22 05:21:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D625B106566B for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:21:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9F98FC16 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:21:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.156] (adsl-19-252-177.bna.bellsouth.net [68.19.252.177]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n3M5KxSg070367 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:20:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) From: Robert Noland To: "Philip M. Gollucci" In-Reply-To: <49EE9D51.2040903@p6m7g8.com> References: <49E75438.2080107@p6m7g8.com> <49E95BFA.7080102@p6m7g8.com> <49EE9D51.2040903@p6m7g8.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-dapc3OW5qHc1wNMYoWb6" Organization: FreeBSD Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:20:48 -0500 Message-Id: <1240377648.1949.19.camel@balrog.2hip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.0 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE += a few ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:21:05 -0000 --=-dapc3OW5qHc1wNMYoWb6 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 00:30 -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > > Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > >> editors/vim > >> mail/procmail > >> net-mgmt/net-snmp > >> net-mgmt/nagios > > another: > >=20 > > devel/pth >=20 > Can I mark these unsafe now thats its thaw ? Marking them unsafe will only effect the port build, it won't effect the packages. So I would say it should be completely safe to have marked them even during freeze, but I'll defer to portmgr... robert. --=20 Robert Noland FreeBSD --=-dapc3OW5qHc1wNMYoWb6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAknuqTAACgkQM4TrQ4qfROPgpwCfczE9WZoE3WdLUAwkR2hlXosH 4xAAmwQg9c+g80wcRPUfqFyjGEMtynXJ =+Jqi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-dapc3OW5qHc1wNMYoWb6--