From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Mar 25 20:55:32 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id UAA10121
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 20:55:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA10114
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 20:55:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id UAA07756; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 20:55:48 -0800
Message-Id: <199603260455.UAA07756@Root.COM>
X-Authentication-Warning: implode.Root.COM: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
cc: Brian Tao <taob@io.org>, FREEBSD-HACKERS-L <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Restricting ping -s and -l 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 25 Mar 1996 20:25:42 PST."
             <96Mar25.202548pst.177478@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 20:55:48 -0800
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>Speaking of ping, anyone mind if I modify ping to print out ICMP errors that 
>it receives in response to the ICMP_ECHO messages that it's sending out?  It 
>has always bothered me that you have to use "ping -v" to diagnose things like 
>getting ICMP unreachables.

   Yes, I'd like to see this, too. "ping -v" is far too verbose on a busy
machine...when all I'm interested in is my own stuff.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project