Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 21:23:52 -0800 (PST) From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) To: billf@chc-chimes.com Cc: n@nectar.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GTK ports -- a recommendation Message-ID: <199812080523.VAA22674@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.96.981207063947.2717B-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com> (message from Bill Fumerola on Mon, 7 Dec 1998 06:40:29 -0500 (EST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* > If folks feel comfortable with this suggestion, I'll go through * > the ports and fix them. If you don't like the idea, or have other * > comments, I'd appreciate hearing them. * * I think that this is a great suggestion. The gtk situation is turning into * another TCL/TK, and this method looks to fix it well. I think the Tcl/Tk analogy is appropriate, but isn't the current port already doing that? === > grep config /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk11/pkg/PLIST bin/gtk11-config @unexec /usr/bin/env OBJFORMAT=%%PORTOBJFORMAT%% /sbin/ldconfig -R @exec /usr/bin/env OBJFORMAT=%%PORTOBJFORMAT%% /sbin/ldconfig -m %B === Incidentally, we need a new gtk11. (The current one has to stay since gnome depends on it.) What's the new version? (gtk113? gtk114?) Vanilla, please let me know what you want me to call it and I'll do a repository copy. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812080523.VAA22674>