Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 22:51:45 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@dsuper.net> Cc: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Mbuf stuff. Message-ID: <20000728225145.A21967@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007261258020.3765-100000@jehovah.technokratis.com>; from bmilekic@dsuper.net on Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 01:02:18PM -0400 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007240739230.62146-100000@jehovah.technokratis.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007261258020.3765-100000@jehovah.technokratis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@dsuper.net> [000726 10:11] wrote: > > > > > intial idea: > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=109252+0+archive/2000/freebsd-net > > > > > > > Summary of Bosko's refinements: > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=185726+0+archive/2000/freebsd-net > > > > > > Okay, the relevant code can now be found at: > > http://24.201.62.9/code/mbuf/newstuff/ > > I still have some modifications to do at a later time, including > a cleanup of things and some changes as well, but the above should > be ready to go in. However, I encourage you to test it first, perhaps > because you may be able to do so more effectively than me (on heavier > loaded machines). > > Regards, > Bosko. > Ok, I've looked over it and it looks really good, the only thing that I wonder about is that perhaps we should pass a pointer to the mbuf instead of just 'arg' to the ext_free routine. I'm sort of undecided about this but wanted to bring it up for discussion. Basically, your call. :) > P.S.: Alfred: thanks. bah, you did all the work! :) -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000728225145.A21967>