Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:10:47 -0800 From: Michael Williams <michaelw@IPRG.nokia.com> To: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Threads (KSE etc) comments Message-ID: <3A240337.D8109556@iprg.nokia.com> References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001121160717.7102A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> <3A1B0B64.6D694248@elischer.org> <3A211C82.2464D07E@elischer.org> <20001127154800.M4140@canonware.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
FYI SPARC machines from Sun or Fujitsu do this both in h/w or just in software i.e. cpu_offline(). Michael Jason Evans wrote: One example of why enforcing KSE/KSEG limits could become hard in the future is if the number of processors is dynamic (i.e. processors can be added and removed). In discussions I've had with Mike Smith, this is a very real possibility, and is something we should keep in mind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A240337.D8109556>